“Embryo destruction has sidetracked good stem cell research long enough”

Such is the argument of Matt Bowman, an op-ed contributor to CNN, who compares embryonic stem cell technology to dinosaurs, bulky TV sets, BetaMax videotapes, and a $10,000 toilet seat?

Bowman is not a scientist but a lawyer, which should make all of us nervous. Yet his argument is sound, that science has made embryonic stem cell research obsolete. His solution? Stop debating the issue and move onto stem cell technology that works, specifically induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). They “do all the things embryonic stem cells do” and don’t involve human embryos.

Read the article, then give us your opinion. Agree or disagree?

Advertisements

There are no comments on this post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: